Pathogenic FANCC Variants Are Associated with Accessory Breasts in a Sub-Saharan African Multiplex Family
Résumé fourni par la source
Accessory breasts denote the formation of extra breast tissue along the milk line, and are known to be more prevalent among Black and Asian populations, affecting both genders. This first-ever study aimed to determine the genetic aetiology of accessory breasts in a multiplex family, where all female siblings present with bilateral accessory breasts. The study also ascertained secondary findings (SFs) responsible for comorbidities. Clinical data and saliva samples were obtained from all family members. Ultrasound and histopathology confirmed the diagnosis. Whole-exome sequencing was conducted on DNA samples obtained from the saliva, with variant calling conducted utilising the Sentieon workflow. Variant classification was based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. After segregation analysis, 12 candidate genes emerged. Among these, PRSS50 and FANCC emerged as top candidates, being implicated in breast diseases. However, two variants in FANCC (c.360del; p.His120GlnfsTer24 and c.355_358del; p.Ser119IlefsTer24) were selected as the most probable causal variants because of the role of this gene in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. The remaining ten genes were reported as potentially accounting for comorbidities segregating with accessory breasts. Reported SFs involve TTR and RYR1. In conclusion, pathogenic variants in FANCC cause familial accessory breasts. These novel observations impact pathophysiology, genetic counselling, and personalised medicine.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pathogenic FANCC Variants Are Associated with Accessory Breasts in a Sub-Saharan African Multiplex Family
- Date Crossref
- 22/10/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.