Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Validation of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry Esophageal Motility Classification Version 2.0: A Study of 805 Patients

5Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry assesses esophageal motility during sedated endoscopy. Recently, the FLIP panometry motility classification was refined (v2.0) in the Dallas Consensus. This study aimed to characterize esophageal motility using the FLIP v2.0 classification scheme and compare its classifications with those of FLIP v1.0 and high-resolution manometry (HRM) diagnoses on the basis of Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0). METHODS: 805 adult patients who completed both FLIP and HRM at two tertiary esophageal centers were included; 704 with conclusive CCv4.0 diagnoses comprised the primary analysis, and 101 with inconclusive CCv4.0 diagnoses were also described. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and contractile response (CR) patterns were evaluated using 16-cm FLIP during sedated endoscopy, with motility classifications defined by FLIP v1.0 and v2.0 criteria. HRM was classified per CCv4.0. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, among the 137 (19%) patients with normal motility on FLIP panometry, 93% had normal motility or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) on HRM. Normal motility on FLIP panometry had a 99% negative predictive value for disorders of EGJ outflow. Among the 163 (23%) patients with non-spastic obstruction (defined by reduced EGJ opening and absent/diminished CR) on FLIP panometry, 91% had a conclusive disorder of EGJ outflow on HRM. Among the 37 patients with type III achalasia on HRM, 16 (43%) were classified as spastic obstruction on FLIP panometry. CONCLUSIONS: FLIP panometry v2.0 categorized esophageal motility in a manner that frequently paralleled the HRM/CCv4.0 diagnoses. FLIP panometry offers a well-tolerated approach that complements, or may be an alternative to, HRM for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Validation of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry Esophageal Motility Classification Version 2.0: A Study of 805 Patients
Date Crossref
22/10/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentEsophageal and GI Pathology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.