Mechanisms of Arsenic Interaction in Bacillus subtilis and Related Species with Biotechnological Potential
Résumé fourni par la source
Arsenic (As) toxicity drives the evolution of resistance mechanisms in environmental microorganisms. Bacteria of the Bacillus genus are frequently identified in isolates from arsenic-contaminated sites, highlighting the importance of understanding the molecular mechanisms related to this bacterial genus. Bacillus subtilis, a soil microorganism and Gram-positive model paradigm, employs multiple strategies to counteract As toxicity, including biosorption, redox transformation, active efflux, and inducible genetic regulation. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in arsenic response in B. subtilis and related species, focusing on the ars and ase operons. The ars operon, located within the mobile SKIN element, encodes a reductase (ArsC), an Acr3-type efflux pump (ArsB), a carbon–arsenic lyase (ArsI/YqcK), and a transcriptional repressor (ArsR), all co-regulated in response to arsenic. In turn, the ase operon contributes to resistance via an ArsB-type efflux system (AseA) and its own regulatory protein (AseR) but lacks an arsenate reductase. Additionally, genes such as aioAB, arrAB, and arsD are discussed, along with evidence for extracellular detoxification and cell surface immobilization of As. Studies on environmental Bacillus species are examined, pointing out the evolutionary implications of As resistance and the biotechnological potential for remediation of contaminated sites.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mechanisms of Arsenic Interaction in Bacillus subtilis and Related Species with Biotechnological Potential
- Date Crossref
- 22/10/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.