Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Through contact tracing, researchers could reconstruct chains of linked cases by linking High-Risk Exposure Contacts (HREC) testing positive to their index case. We present chain-level descriptives, delays and an individual-level analysis of the events that determine chain progression. METHODS: We used data from contact tracing outside of collectivities between September 2020 and March 2022 in Belgium. We present chain-level generation counts and structure. The individual-level analysis focusses on the events necessary to establish transmission chains from index cases: inclusion, successful contact with the call center, reporting HREC, identifying HREC and testing of HREC. We adjusted for age, sex, household, calendar time, region, vaccination, laboratory-confirmed prior infection, viral load, symptoms and the place in the transmission chain: we differentiated Cases Identified As HREC (CIAH, index cases that had been identified as HREC of another index case) from primary cases. RESULTS: The percentage of CIAH over all cases was 14% and most CIAH (63%) were household-members of the index case. Unsuccessful contact of cases (34% of all index cases) and reporting no HREC (53% of successfully contacted index cases) ended most chains. Among identified HREC, 75% had at least one test result. Persons age 65 and over were less likely successfully contacted (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.58–0.59)), reporting HREC (OR 0.55 (95%CI 0.54–0.56)) or tested as HREC (OR 0.87 (95%CI 0.85–0.89), reference 25–44 year old). Compared to primary cases, CIAH were associated with less HREC and lower HREC test positivity. Delays however were comparable. The delay from symptom-onset to test result exceeded 4 days for 29% of CIAH. CONCLUSIONS: While contact tracing effectively reduced transmission within identified chains, over 80% of cases remained unlinked due to, amongst others, contact failures and non-reporting of HREC. Future efforts would benefit from operational improvements and enhanced population participation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence
Date Crossref
22/10/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

COVID-19 Digital Contact TracingCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Exploration à la demande auprès d’OpenAlex, avec contrôle bibliographique public par Crossref. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.