Towards a more integrative environmental assessment: Infauna as tool for Zostera marina conservation management

Résumé fourni par la source

Seagrasses are highly sensitive to human-induced disturbances and global environmental changes. Since the 1980s, Zostera marina meadows along the West Swedish coast (Skagerrak) have declined significantly, as evidenced by changes in morpho-anatomical traits, reductions in area coverage, and shifts in associated communities. However, infaunal assemblages within Z. marina meadows remain understudied compared to epifaunal communities and have not been previously used as indicators of seagrass regression. To investigate spatial variability in infaunal composition, we analysed samples from 15 coastal stations at depths of 1.5-3 m depth. Using an n-dimensional hypervolume framework, we assessed functional differences between infaunal and epifaunal communities. We examined infaunal community descriptors-such as species richness and individual abundance-biotic indices, environmental drivers (including wave exposure and Z. marina biomass), and correlations with epifauna. Variability in infaunal composition across sampling stations was primarily driven by differences in the abundance of dominant taxa, including the polychaete Capitella capitata, oligochaetes, nematodes, and chironomids. Several coastal stations, such as Marstrand and Finsbo, were classified as moderately polluted, though biotic indices, i.e., AMBI, M-AMBI and ISI, showed discrepancies. Spatial patterns in infaunal assemblages were mainly influenced by Z. marina biomass and maximum fetch, with a good representation of oligochaetes and chironomids in exposed stations. These findings suggest that infauna respond differently from epifauna but provide valuable additional insights into the ecological status, functional traits, and trophic diversity of Z. marina meadows. Integrating multiple community components is essential for a more comprehensive understanding of the processes and patterns driving seagrass ecosystem regression.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.