Utility of placental growth factor for preeclampsia prediction in pregnancies complicated by sickle cell disease

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT: Outside of pregnancy, placental growth factor (PlGF), is produced by erythroid cells in typically undetectable levels. In pregnancy, PlGF is strongly expressed by the trophoblast layer covering the placental villi. PlGF levels rise progressively due to placental growth, peak at 28 to 30 weeks gestation, and then slowly decline toward term. Low PlGF has emerged as a powerful diagnostic test for preterm preeclampsia. However, its interpretation in context of sickle cell disease (SCD) is potentially confounded by upregulation of cellular PlGF expression in nonpregnant individuals with SCD, and higher third trimester circulating PlGF levels documented in healthy Black compared with White individuals. Primary objectives were to determine the distribution of PlGF at midtrimester in pregnant individuals with SCD compared with unaffected Black controls and to explore the diagnostic accuracy of PlGF in the context of suspected preeclampsia in pregnancies of individuals with SCD. Secondary objective was to examine the relationship between low PlGF and placental disease in pregnancies of individuals with SCD. Pregnant individuals with SCD at Mount Sinai Hospital in Canada (January 2017 to September 2021) with at least 1 PlGF measurement 20+0 to 35+6 weeks gestation, and pregnant Black controls without SCD with suspected preeclampsia or growth restriction, were included in this retrospective study. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were extracted from medical records. For early-onset, but not late-onset, preeclampsia, a PlGF cutoff of <100 pg/mL demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity at 20 to 24 weeks gestation. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate the utility of PlGF in predicting early-onset preeclampsia in pregnancies of individuals with SCD, allowing clinicians to anticipate and mitigate adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.