p190A/ ARHGAP35 and p190B/ ARHGAP5 proteins in endometrial cancer, a novel cancer-relevant paralog interplay
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Endometrial cancer is one of the main gynecological malignancies worldwide, with an estimated 320, 000 new cases annually. Several studies highlight ARHGAP35 as a significantly mutated gene in these tumors. It encodes for the protein p190RhoGAP-A (p190A), which is a major regulator of the small GTPase family of proteins. ARHGAP5 is a paralog of ARHGAP35 that encodes the protein p190RhoGAP-B (p190B). By analyzing human endometrial cancer samples, we found a co-occurrence of mutations in ARHGAP35 and ARHGAP5 genes and we reported that both are less expressed at the mRNA level in tumoral samples compared to healthy tissues. We were interested in understanding the impact of p190A/B under-expression in endometrial cancer and the relationship between the two paralogs. To do so, we have used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate HEC-1-A knockout cells for p190A and p190B. We showed that removal of each paralog led to a similar actin remodeling phenotype with the formation of Cross-Linked Actin Networks (CLANs), dependent on the Rho/ROCK pathway. Moreover, proteomic analysis of p190A and p190B knockout cells highlighted similar affected cell functions. Finally, our study demonstrates a synthetic lethality between p190A and p190B where removal of both paralogs is deleterious in endometrial cancer cells, unveiling a potential actionable vulnerability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- p190A/ <i>ARHGAP35</i> and p190B/ <i>ARHGAP5</i> proteins in endometrial cancer, a novel cancer-relevant paralog interplay
- Date Crossref
- 16/10/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.