Deep-Learning-based Velocity Prediction Model for Fast Optical Coherence Elastography Processing
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Optical coherence elastography (OCE) enables quantitative assessment of tissue biomechanical properties by analyzing surface acoustic wave (SAW) velocities. However, current estimation methods require significant expertise and lengthy image processing times, limiting the clinical translation of this promising technology. This study presents a SAW velocity prediction network (SP-Net), a novel end-to-end deep learning model designed for rapid and accurate prediction of SAW velocities from raw OCE phase data of human skin in vivo, addressing the need for rapid and high-accuracy analysis in clinical settings. By using a convolutional-transformer which combines the advantages of local feature extraction and global information processing, SP-Net can extract wave propagation features efficiently, achieving robust performance and high accuracy across diverse tissue types, including tissue-mimicking agar phantoms, healthy human skin and facial acne. The SP-Net has the closest matched predicted velocity compared to the time-of-flight method (10.18 ± 1.27 vs. 10.13 ± 1.53 m/s) in the facial acne case. The experiment results show that SP-Net has the best balance among accuracy, efficiency, and model complexity, significantly improving prediction accuracy by 17% over VP-Net. This method is beneficial for future skin research to allow the real-time tissue biomechanical properties visualization.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Deep-Learning-based Velocity Prediction Model for Fast Optical Coherence Elastography Processing
- Date Crossref
- 15/09/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.