JWST Observations of SN 2024ggi. I. Interpretation and Model Comparison of the Type II Supernova 2024ggi at 55 Days past Explosion
Rattachement africain : us, de, au, ar, jp, es, fr, gb, cl, dk, th, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We present panchromatic 0.4–21 μ m observations of the nearby (∼7.2 Mpc) Type II supernova (SN) 2024ggi, obtained during the plateau phase at ∼55 days past explosion. Our data set includes JWST spectra spanning 1.7–14 μ m, mid-infrared (MIR) imaging at 7.7 and 21 μ m, and near-simultaneous ground-based optical and near-infrared (NIR) spectra covering 0.32−1.8 μ m. The NIR and MIR spectral features of SN 2024ggi are dominated by H i emission. We present line IDs and a toy PHOENIX/1D model that reproduces the observations well, especially the continuum redward of 0.9 μ m. We compare SN 2024ggi to SN 2022acko and SN 2023ixf, two other Type II SNe that were also observed by JWST, and highlight key similarities and differences in their spectral features. No evidence for a MIR excess or dust is found at these epochs, with the model matching the observed flux out to 21 μ m. We discuss the model’s shortcomings, focusing on the density profile, which suppresses line blanketing and produces features in the optical that are too narrow. Our results show the power of panchromatic studies in both exploring the nature of the SN ejecta and constraining detailed models of SNe.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- JWST Observations of SN 2024ggi. I. Interpretation and Model Comparison of the Type II Supernova 2024ggi at 55 Days past Explosion
- Date Crossref
- 28/11/2025
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.