Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background and Aim: Underweight young adult women are vulnerable to health risks such as menstrual disorders and vitamin deficiencies. Because few seek medical care for low body weight, the underlying causes remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the associations of body type with dietary patterns and gut microbiota diversity in young women. Methods: We enrolled 40 women aged 20–39 years who visited a nutrition evaluation clinic with a BMI < 17.5 at their first consultation (underweight group) and 40 age-matched women with 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 (control group). Some women in the underweight group were no longer underweight at the time of analysis but were classified based on their initial BMI. Dietary patterns were assessed based on ten major food categories (meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, soybeans, green and yellow vegetables, seaweed, fruit, tubers, and fats and oil) based on the Food Frequency Questionnaire based on Food Groups. Gut microbiota α-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou indices, while β-diversity was analyzed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and redundancy analysis (RDA). Genera contributing to group differences were identified by RDA and ANOVA-Like Differential Expression tool (ALDEx2). Results: Underweight women had significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity, while no difference was observed in dietary patterns. NMDS revealed significant β-diversity differences in gut microbiota (PERMANOVA: R2 = 0.064, F = 5.31, p = 0.0001) but not in dietary patterns (p = 0.99). RDA showed that body type explained 4.5% of variance (adjusted R2 = 0.032, F = 3.65, p = 0.0005). Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Enterocloster, and Erysipelatoclostridium were enriched in underweight women, whereas Fusicatenibacter, Agathobacter, Dorea, and Prevotella were enriched in controls. AldEx2 confirmed increases in Bacteroides, Enterocloster, and Erysipelatoclostridium and a decrease in Dorea. Conclusions: Underweight women demonstrated reduced gut microbiota diversity and enrichment of taxa associated with inflammatory tendencies. Dietary therapies involving not only prebiotics but also probiotics may beneficially modulate gut microbiota and contribute to the management of low body weight.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Gut Microbiota α- and β-Diversity, but Not Dietary Patterns, Differ Between Underweight and Normal-Weight Japanese Women Aged 20–39 Years
Date Crossref
17/10/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Diet and metabolism studiesGut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and Diet

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.