Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Perception of Support, Communication, and Burnout

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between burnout scores for patient safety professionals and perceived support from the National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) and direct communication with medical center directors in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Our secondary objective was to analyze qualitative responses on communication barriers to identify areas for improvement. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: A system-wide cross-sectional quality improvement survey of VA patient safety professionals. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Our final sample included 212 patient safety professionals who completed a questionnaire adapted from the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. The survey measured personal, work-related, and facility-related burnout, with an additional item addressing the emotional impact of patient safety events. Nonparametric tests were used to examine relationships due to small sample sizes and non-normal distributions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Feeling supported by the NCPS was associated with significantly lower burnout scores across all dimensions ( P <0.001). Facility staff-related burnout was higher among those reporting communication barriers with directors ( P =0.012), although one-on-one communication was not significantly associated with lower burnout scores. Qualitative responses from 12 participants identified logistical and bureaucratic challenges as key barriers to direct communication with directors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that organizational support may help mitigate burnout among patient safety professionals. Addressing logistical and bureaucratic barriers could enhance communication and improve the effectiveness of patient safety programs in the VA as well as other systems of care.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Perception of Support, Communication, and Burnout
Date Crossref
17/10/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHospital Admissions and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.