Mesh-mediated fascial traction for open abdomen management to prevent planned ventral hernias: a retrospective cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Open abdomen is indicated in some clinical scenarios, but it introduces new challenges like the development of planned incisional hernias; new management techniques for temporary closure in open abdomen such as negative pressure wound therapy and mesh-mediated fascial traction have shown an incidence reduction of this outcome. However, for successful abdominal wall closure rates, there is limited evidence evaluating the factors associated with it when mesh-mediated fascial traction is employed in the context of open abdomen. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed with mesh-mediated fascial traction at Méderi Hospital Network from 2020 to 2025. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, surgical variables, and postoperative outcomes were systematically evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included, achieving a definitive abdominal wall closure success rate of 70.7%. Closure failure was significantly correlated with more than four peritoneal lavage procedures, intestinal resection, and initial fascial defects greater than 7.5 cm. Primary indications for OA management were peritonitis/sepsis (34.8%) and bowel obstruction (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Mesh-mediated fascial traction is effective for definitive abdominal wall closure in a majority of patients. However, identifying those at increased risk for closure failure is vital. Utilizing a tailored decision-making algorithm based on specific predictors can optimize clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mesh-mediated fascial traction for open abdomen management to prevent planned ventral hernias: a retrospective cohort
- Date Crossref
- 16/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.