Documentation and evaluation of care of dying patients
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Evaluate the quality of documentation and delivery of EOLC in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare with a pre-pandemic audit. Retrospective clinical audit of medical records of patients who died in ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, January 2021 to February 2022, using the Documentation and Evaluation of Care of Dying Equation (DECODE) survey tool. Three metropolitan adult ICUs in Victoria, Australia. DECODE audit score, patient characteristics, demographics, end of life planning, quality of death indicators, management of dying. There were 194 deaths over a 14-month period. 2 cases were excluded. Patients wishes were documented in 83 (43%) cases. A total of 175 patients (91%) were receiving active treatment 24 h before death. A total of 166 deaths (86%) were expected and occurred a mean of 4.5 (IQR 2-9) days from admission to ICU. A total of 52 (27%) had palliative or symptom control care plans. The median DECODE score was 14 (IQR 12-15) with statistical variation across the three sites ( p=0.001 ). Compared to pre pandemic audits, the DECODE score was higher ( p=0.001 ) despite pandemic restrictions. EOLC in ICU remains challenging due to diagnostic dilemmas, prognostic uncertainty, and short time-frames. Assessment of quality of EoLC care helps assess and possibly improve provision of care. The DECODE questionnaire provides a semi-objective measure of quality of care provided to the dying patient in ICU.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Documentation and evaluation of care of dying patients
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Eastern Health pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Eastern Health.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.