The relation of eye movements to the occurrence of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease
Rattachement africain : mx, ca, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Freezing of gait is a debilitating motor symptom in Parkinson's disease that significantly increases fall risk and impairs quality of life. The poorly understood pathophysiology of freezing of gait presents challenges for early prediction and therapeutic intervention. This prospective study investigated whether eye movement abnormalities, specifically in the anti-saccade paradigm, could predict freezing of gait onset in Parkinson's disease patients over a two-year follow-up period. We analysed longitudinal data from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative, focusing on Parkinson's disease patients without freezing of gait at baseline who underwent comprehensive clinical evaluations and eye movement recordings. Anti-saccade reaction time and error ratio, combined with clinical measures including right upper extremity rigidity, demonstrated significant predictive value for freezing of gait development within two years. These findings suggest that eye movement deficits and upper limb rigidity emerge years before freezing of gait onset, indicating a prodromal phase in freezing of gait pathogenesis. The predictive relationship between these measures supports the hypothesis of shared neural substrates, potentially involving the mesencephalic locomotor region, in the development of both oculomotor dysfunction and gait freezing episodes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The relation of eye movements to the occurrence of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.