A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Generative AI is applied in an ever-growing set of domains and tasks, leading to an expanding set of risks of harm impacting people, communities, society, and the environment. These risks may arise due to failures during the design and development of the technology, as well as during its release, deployment, or downstream usages and appropriations of its outputs. In this paper, building on prior taxonomies of AI risks, harms, and failures, we construct a taxonomy specifically for Generative AI failures and map them to the harms they're associated with in the real world. Through a systematic analysis of 499 publicly reported incidents of harm involving Generative AI, we describe what harms are reported and how often, how they tend to arise, and who they impact. We find that most reported incidents are associated with use-related failures but the harms are experienced by parties beyond the end user(s) of the system at fault, and that the landscape of Generative AI harms is distinct from that of traditional AI. Our work offers actionable insights to policymakers, developers, and end users. In particular, we call for the prioritization of non-technical risk and harm mitigation strategies that center responsible use, including public disclosures, AI literacy efforts, and careful regulatory stances.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents
- Date Crossref
- 15/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Carnegie Mellon University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Carnegie Mellon University.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.