QSAR Models for Predicting Oral Bioavailability and Volume of Distribution and Their Application in Mapping the TK Space of Endocrine Disruptors
Rattachement africain : fr, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Toxicokinetic (TK) properties are essential in the framework of chemical risk assessment and drug discovery. Specifically, a TK profile provides information about the fate of chemicals in the human body. In this context, Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) models are convenient computational tools for predicting TK properties. Here, we developed QSAR models to predict two TK properties: oral bioavailability and volume of distribution at steady state (VDss). We collected and curated two large sets of 1712 and 1591 chemicals for oral bioavailability and VDss, respectively, and compared regression and classification (binary and multiclass) models with the application of several machine learning algorithms. The best predictive performance of the models for regression (R) prediction was characterized by a Q2F3 of 0.34 with the R-CatBoost model for oral bioavailability and a geometric mean fold error (GMFE) of 2.35 with the R-RF model for VDss. The models were then applied to a list of potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), highlighting chemicals with a high probability of posing a risk to human health due to their TK profiles. Based on the results obtained, insights into the structural determinants of TK properties for EDCs are further discussed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- QSAR Models for Predicting Oral Bioavailability and Volume of Distribution and Their Application in Mapping the TK Space of Endocrine Disruptors
- Date Crossref
- 15/10/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.