Ocular Motor Abnormalities in Functional Neurological Disorder: A Video‐Oculography Study
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Functional neurological disorders (FND) can include various sensory, motor or cognitive symptoms. Eye movement recordings, measured through video-oculography, could serve as biomarkers for characterizing these dysfunctions in FND. OBJECTIVE: To identify oculomotor patterns that may help to support a positive diagnosis of FND. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of video-oculography recordings performed between 2011 and 2023 in 149 patients with FND, focusing on horizontal and vertical prosaccades, smooth pursuit, and antisaccades. These data were compared with those obtained from 132 age and gender-matched healthy volunteers and 43 patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). RESULTS: FND patients exhibited significantly increased mean saccade latencies in both horizontal and vertical prosaccade tasks compared to controls (t-test, P < 0.0001). Additionally, variability in horizontal and upward saccade latency was substantially greater in the FND group than in the control and MS groups (P < 0.0001). Vertical saccades in FND patients were hypometric (P < 0.0001) with increased variability of upward saccade amplitude (P < 0.0001). Both MS and FND patients had higher antisaccade error rates than controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that video oculography may be useful in understanding the pathophysiology of FND and highlight its potential as a complementary tool to support diagnostic reasoning in complex clinical presentations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ocular Motor Abnormalities in Functional Neurological Disorder: A Video‐Oculography Study
- Date Crossref
- 15/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.