Discovery potential of future electron-positron colliders for a 95 GeV scalar
Rattachement africain : in, Afrique du Sud, ch, fr, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Large Electron Positron collider observed an indication for a new Higgs boson with a mass around 95 GeV-100 GeV in the process e + e − → Z * → Z S with S → b b ¯ . The interest in this excess re-emerged with the di-photon signature at ≈ 95 GeV at the Large Hadron Collider. In fact, a combined global significance of 3.4 σ is obtained once W W and τ τ signals are included in addition. In this article, we perform a feasibility study for discovering such a new scalar S at future electron-positron colliders using the recoil-mass method applied to e + e − → Z S with Z → μ + μ − and S → b b ¯ . For this, we employ a Deep Neural Network to enhance the separation between the Standard Model background and the signal, reducing the required integrated luminosity necessary for discovery by a factor of two to three. As a result, an S U ( 2 ) L singlet Higgs with a mass of ≈ 95 GeV can be observed with more than 5 σ significance at a 250 GeV centre-of-mass energy collider with 5 a b − 1 integrated luminosity if it has a mixing angle of at least 0.1 with the Standard Model Higgs, which means that a discovery can be achieved within the whole 95 % confidence-level region preferred by Large Electron Positron excess. Furthermore, including more decay channels such as S → τ τ and Z → e + e − further enhances the discovery potential of future e + e − accelerators, like CEPC, CLIC, FCC-ee and ILC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Discovery potential of future electron-positron colliders for a 95 GeV scalar
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.