Transforming youth engagement in disaster risk management and heritage conservation through adapting the concept of brain re-engineering and reimagination
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The escalating intensity of global disasters and the growing vulnerability of cultural heritage require innovative solutions that actively engage youth as key stakeholders. Despite their potential for creativity, innovation, and technological proficiency, youth remain significantly underrepresented in disaster risk management (DRM) and heritage conservation efforts. This paper introduces the Brain Re-Engineering and Reimagination (BRECR) framework, adapted from its original use in agriculture, as a strategic approach to addressing these gaps and catalyzing youth-led initiatives. The BRECR framework comprises five pillars: perception change, ideation and enterprise, technological solutions, sustainability, and social equity in public policy. We argue that by reshaping societal narratives, fostering youth-driven innovation hubs, integrating advanced technologies, and emphasizing long-term capacity building, we demonstrate how BRECR can bridge critical gaps in policy, education, and practice. This paper proposes actionable strategies for enhancing youth engagement and empowerment, positioning them as leaders in building resilient communities and safeguarding cultural heritage. By reimagining youth as active changemakers, we can harness their creativity and technological expertise to establish inclusive, sustainable, and impactful solutions for future generations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Transforming youth engagement in disaster risk management and heritage conservation through adapting the concept of brain re-engineering and reimagination
- Date Crossref
- 13/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.