Drugging the DNA damage response in the clinic: going beyond PARP
Rattachement africain : us, es, sg, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in oncology. This review highlights the growing clinical relevance of DDR inhibitors beyond PARP inhibitors, focusing on novel targets, biomarker-driven patient selection, and rational combination strategies.Areas Covered A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2025, using terms such as ‘DDR inhibitors,’ ‘synthetic lethality,’ and the names of specific DDR targets. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data on next-generation DDR inhibitors, including agents targeting ATR, ATM, APE1, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, CDC7, PLK4, PKMYT1, Polθ, USP1, PARG, WRN, and ALC1. It discusses mechanistic rationale, clinical activity, and safety profiles, with emphasis on combination strategies involving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and other DDR agents. Key challenges such as resistance, cumulative toxicity, and the need for predictive biomarkers are also addressed.Expert Opinion DDR-targeting agents hold significant promise, especially when guided by predictive biomarkers and combined with other therapies. As these agents move into later-phase trials, future development should emphasize biomarker-driven design, toxicity mitigation through dose optimization, and expansion into non-canonical tumor types to maximize clinical impact.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Drugging the DNA damage response in the clinic: going beyond PARP
- Date Crossref
- 25/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.