MerQuaCo: a computational tool for quality control in image-based spatial transcriptomics
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Image-based spatial transcriptomics platforms are powerful tools often used to identify cell populations and describe gene expression in intact tissue. Spatial experiments return large, high-dimensional datasets and several open-source software packages are available to facilitate analysis and visualization. The outputs of spatial transcriptomics platforms are typically imperfect. For example, local variations in transcript detection probability are common. Software tools to characterize imperfections and their impact on downstream analyses are lacking so the data quality is assessed manually, a laborious and often a subjective process. Here we describe imperfections in a dataset of 641 fresh-frozen adult mouse brain sections collected using the Vizgen MERSCOPE. Common imperfections included the local loss of tissue from the section, tissue outside the imaging volume due to detachment from the coverslip, transcripts missing due to dropped images, varying detection probability through space, and differences in transcript detection probability between experiments. We describe the incidence of each imperfection and the likely impact on the accuracy of cell type labels. We develop MerQuaCo, open-source code that detects and quantifies imperfections without user input, facilitating the selection of sections for further analysis with existing packages. Together, our results and MerQuaCo facilitate rigorous, objective assessment of the quality of spatial transcriptomics results.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- MerQuaCo: a computational tool for quality control in image-based spatial transcriptomics
- Date Crossref
- 14/10/2025
- Éditeur
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.