Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-paper

Reason Analysis for Higher or Lower Productivity of MFHW in Tight Gas Reservoirs Based on Well Testing Theory

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Field data indicate that the production capacity of single wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs can be significantly enhanced through large-scale, multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. However, production anomalies have been consistently observed in fractured gas wells during subsequent production phases. These anomalies are typically reflected in either higher or lower than expected well productivity. At present, effective methods for the rapid identification and systematic interpretation of such production anomalies in multi-stage fractured horizontal wells (MFHWs) remain inadequate. To address this limitation, an integrated analytical method was established based on well testing and seepage theory. In this method, production performance data were coupled with linear flow analysis to systematically diagnose the causes of production anomalies. Firstly, an improved trilinear flow model was established to describe the seepage characteristics of each reservoir zone after hydraulic fracturing in tight sandstone gas reservoirs. The non-uniqueness of parameter inversion was constrained using the rate-normalized pressure (RNP) diagnostic plot. As a result, reasonable interpretations of reservoir parameters, fracture parameters and Ak were obtained. Then, cumulative gas production and fracturing parameters were normalized for individual wells. Based on these, normalized cumulative production plots under different influencing factors were constructed to quickly identify abnormal gas wells. Sensitivity plots between Ak and various fracturing parameters were generated using data from 206 typical wells. The correlations between fracturing parameters and Ak were analyzed to evaluate the fracturing scale. In addition, the reasons for higher or lower well productivity were explained based on these plots. Finally, the reliability of the interpretation results was verified using multiple datasets, including post-fracture flowback data. The results indicate that high or low production abnormal wells can be rapidly identified based on the normalized cumulative production plots. A positive correlation between Ak and fracturing parameters was observed from the sensitivity analysis plots. In addition, the possible causes of production anomalies in fractured wells can also be interpreted using these plots. Specifically, the abnormal high or low gas production is attributed to the mismatch between the theoretical fracturing scale and the actual fracturing effectiveness.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Reason Analysis for Higher or Lower Productivity of MFHW in Tight Gas Reservoirs Based on Well Testing Theory
Date Crossref
13/10/2025
Éditeur
SPE
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.