Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Rational use of antibiotics at primary & secondary healthcare facilities in district Panchkula, Haryana, North India: A cross-sectional study

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background & objectives Antimicrobial prescriptions by doctors are crucial in managing acute illnesses but contribute significantly to antimicrobial resistance if misused. This study aimed to assess the rational use of antibiotics in outpatient public healthcare settings in Panchkula, Haryana. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across 18 primary and two secondary healthcare facilities in the district of Panchkula, Haryana. Antimicrobial prescriptions (n=945) were assessed for comprehensiveness and rationality using the pretested and validated antimicrobial prescription assessment tool and standard treatment guidelines. World Health Organisation's anatomic therapeutic chemical and defined daily dose index (WHOCC-ATC/DDD) was used to calculate defined daily dose (DDD) for adult prescriptions, and days of therapy (DOT) were calculated for paediatric patients. We used descriptive statistics to summarise the findings and chi-square test to compare the proportions of rational and irrational prescriptions. Results Of 945 antibiotic prescriptions, only 0.4 per cent (n=4) of prescriptions were comprehensive. Among prescriptions eligible for rationality assessment (n=647, 68.5%) antibiotic therapy was indicated in 44 per cent (n=285), of which only 3.5 per cent (n=33) were rational, 20.2 per cent (n=191) moderately rational and 76.3 per cent irrational (n=721). Irrational prescriptions were most common in respiratory (n=415, 95%), gastrointestinal (n=105, 92.9%), and dermatological (n=21, 76%) ailments. The completeness of the prescriptions was low, with information on dosage of antibiotics (n=265, 28%), laboratory investigations (n=331, 35%), diagnosis (n=94, 10%), and co-morbidities (n=96, 10%). The prescribed antibiotic doses exceeded the WHO-DDD recommendations, with irrational prescribing significantly higher among paediatric prescriptions (89.6%) as compared with adult prescriptions (74.3%; adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.7, P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions Antibiotic prescriptions in primary and secondary care outpatient departments demonstrated widespread irrationality, highlighting the importance of implementing a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programme in these settings.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Rational use of antibiotics at primary &amp; secondary healthcare facilities in district Panchkula, Haryana, North India: A cross-sectional study
Date Crossref
10/10/2025
Éditeur
Scientific Scholar
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antibiotic Use and ResistancePneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.