Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Too much or too little? The trajectory of systemic anti-cancer treatment throughout the last year of life of lung cancer patients in Norway

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
10Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The use of systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) at the end of life (EOL) is controversial. The evidence and detailed description of the dynamics of its use are deficient, especially after the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. METHODS: Clinical information about lung cancer patients dying in the years 2020-2023 was extracted from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Available data on intravenous and oral SACT enabled the calculation of the proportion of patients who received SACT each of the 360 days before death. RESULTS: A total of 8953 patients were eligible for this study. At day 30, 7, and 1 before death, 8.9%, 1.3%, and 0.4% respectively, received SACT. The reduction was mainly caused by reduced use of chemotherapy and immunotherapy closer to death. Independent predictors for receiving SACT at day 30 before death were young age, male sex, small-cell lung cancer, short time from diagnosis to death, and good performance status. CONCLUSION: The presented low use of SACT at EOL has been achieved in a population where good survival has been documented. Patients with poor performance status and older age received less SACT than patients with good performance status and younger age.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Too much or too little? The trajectory of systemic anti-cancer treatment throughout the last year of life of lung cancer patients in Norway
Date Crossref
09/10/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.