Meta-Learning in Biologically Informed Recurrent Neural Networks for Personalized System Identification of Glucose--Insulin Dynamics
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The management of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus remains a major challenge, as it requires continuous regulation of blood glucose levels. Automated systems, such as the artificial pancreas, address this need by relying on accurate patient-specific models. While linear physiological models are popular in the literature due to their interpretability, their linear structure struggles to capture the complex dynamics of the glucose-insulin system, resulting in low prediction performance. This is particularly challenging given the significant inter-patient variability in glucose-insulin dynamics. More complex models, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), can achieve high modeling performance, but their black-box structure lacks interpretability, reducing clinical trust and leading to possible problems for regulatory acceptance. In this work, we propose a hybrid approach using knowledge-guided learning to structure RNNs to model the glucose-insulin dynamics in diabetic patients, merging biological interpretability with high predictive performance. Furthermore, we present a meta-learning approach to address the problem of inter-patient variability. Statistical analysis will show that the proposed methodologies improve prediction performance while maintaining a high level of interpretability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Meta-Learning in Biologically Informed Recurrent Neural Networks for Personalized System Identification of Glucose--Insulin Dynamics
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.