Prostate cancer diagnostics: the independent and combined roles of SelectMDx and mpMRI
Rattachement africain : ro. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Prostate cancer is a major global health concern, affecting one in every eight men over the course of their lives. Early detection and precise risk stratification are essential for distinguishing indolent types from aggressive cancer that necessitates immediate treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), although its widespread use in prostate cancer screening, lacks specificity, resulting in unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment of clinically insignificant malignancies. The SelectMDx test, a non-invasive molecular diagnostic tool, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic precision. This study compares the independent and combination diagnostic performance of SelectMDx and mpMRI in patients with intermediate PSA levels. Material and methods: , in addition to clinical data, to create a risk score for clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) (grade group ≥2). PI-RADS version 2.1 was used to rate mpMRI images. Lesions with a grade of ≥3 were considered suspicious. Logistic regression models were used to determine the predictive power of SelectMDx, PI-RADS, and their combination. The diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The medical relevance of reducing unnecessary biopsies has been studied using decision curve analysis. Results: SelectMDx showed a sensitivity of 89.2%, a specificity of 61.8%, a PPV of 49.25%, and an negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.22%. Patients with positive SelectMDx results had a 13.35-fold greater risk of clinically severe PCa (p <0.001). Using mpMRI with PI-RADS scoring improved detection of high-grade PCa. A PI-RADS score of ≥4 corresponded to a 7.13-fold higher probability of aggressive cancer (p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for SelectMDx and patient age reduced the predictive value of PI-RADS ≥4 (adjusted OR = 1.49; p = 0.555). Standalone SelectMDx outperformed its combination with mpMRI in terms of diagnostic accuracy, as shown by higher AUC values and better DCA results. Conclusions: The SelectMDx test is a highly effective and reliable diagnostic tool for predicting clinically severe PCa in individuals with intermediate PSA levels. Its high NPV avoids unnecessary biopsies and their associated morbidity. While integrating SelectMDx with mpMRI provides new diagnostic insights, the molecular test revealed superior accuracy when used alone, confirming its importance in precision medicine.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prostate cancer diagnostics: the independent and combined roles of SelectMDx and mpMRI
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Department of Urology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
"Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele" Clinical Hospital Department of Urology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Medical Sciences Section pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest et Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.