PD-L1 has a stronger effect on increasing headache risk than PD-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the risk of headaches caused by programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. METHOD: Relevant clinical trials were screened using PubMed. The risk of headache associated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors was calculated using the mirror principle and PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 33 clinical trials were screened for this comprehensive meta-analysis, yielding nine mirror-pairing groups. The risk of headache with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors was significantly higher than that with placebo (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: [1.06, 2.06], Z = 2.33, P = 0.02) and similar to that with chemotherapy drugs (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: [0.84, 1.34], Z = 0.49, P = 0.62). When PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors are combined with other immune-related drugs, the risk of headaches increases to varying degrees. However, when combined with chemotherapy, this risk did not increase significantly (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: [0.78, 1.32], Z = 0.11, P = 0.91). Compared with PD-1, PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a higher headache risk (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: [0.64, 2.12], Z = 1.51, P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: PD-L1 has a stronger effect on increasing headache risk than PD-1. Similar to the comparison of PD-1 or PD-L1 versus chemotherapy, PD-1 or PD-L1 plus chemotherapy did not significantly increase headache risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- PD-L1 has a stronger effect on increasing headache risk than PD-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 08/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.