PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, BIOEQUIVALENCE (IN-VITRO) AND COMPATIBILITY STUDY OF SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORM (HARD CAPSULE) TETRACYCLINE
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study reports the formulation development, analytical validation, and in-vitro comparative evaluation of generic Product Tetracycline 250mg hard gelatin capsules. The formulation was designed using Tetracycline as the active pharmaceutical ingredient, along with pharmacopeial excipients selected based on excipient compatibility studies conducted under accelerated conditions. The finished product met British Pharmacopoeia (B.P.) specifications for assay, dissolution, uniformity of dosage, and water content. Analytical method validation was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the method fulfilled all ICH and USP requirements for system suitability, specificity, accuracy, precision (repeatability and intermediate), robustness, and spiking recovery. Comparative dissolution studies were carried out in 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2), acetate buffer (pH 4.5), and phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) using USP Apparatus II. The test product demonstrated more than 85% drug release within 15 minutes in all media, and exhibited similarity factor (f2) values greater than 50 and difference factor (f1) values below 15 when compared with the reference product Resteclin® 250 mg. These results confirm the pharmaceutical equivalence of the test formulation and support its suitability for local production and regulatory approval.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, BIOEQUIVALENCE (IN-VITRO) AND COMPATIBILITY STUDY OF SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORM (HARD CAPSULE) TETRACYCLINE
- Date Crossref
- 29/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Leading Educational Research Institute
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.