Development and Validation of a Measure of Valuing Family Care Labor With U.S. Samples
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Unpaid family care labor, disproportionately completed by women, has been consistently devalued. Research on caregiving has been hindered by the absence of a measure to capture the extent to which individuals value caregiving, inhibiting research on this topic. The purpose of this research was to validate a new two-dimensional measure of valuing family care labor, defined as the belief that care labor is (a) important work and (b) deserves societal investment and compensation. Across five U.S.-based samples (total N = 1,344; 56.6% women, M age = 33.1, 67.6% White), we provide evidence of internal consistency, construct validity, and some initial criterion-related validity for this new measure. As expected, valuing care labor was positively related to communal values and welfare support and negatively related to traditional gender ideology. Also, women scored significantly higher on the measure than men. Unexpectedly, there were no significant differences based on race or ethnicity, caregiver experience, or income. This newly validated measure provides a valuable tool for practitioners, policy makers, and scholars to examine shifts in how individuals value care, an important step for evaluating future efforts undertaken to support the fostering of a more caring society. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ ' s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843251382257
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development and Validation of a Measure of Valuing Family Care Labor With U.S. Samples
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Texas A&M University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
M University (TAMU) Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Texas A&M University et Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences — M University (TAMU).
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.