Analysis of Deep Learning Models on VQA(Toloka)Dataset
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a recent task at the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing. In this task, instead of giving phrase images, machines will go on to learn and interpret them. It is also their job to answer any question in turn. Instead of the usual "Images ten questions", it relies on phrases reversed in order and asks unrelated questions about pictures. One way which VQA current challenges itself picks up new trends is with this issue for the model to predict an image and where provide bounding box as output, given input image together with a questioning on natural language sentence. Unlike traditional VQA tasks, where the model outputs a textual answer, this challenge presents a more complex scenario by not explicitly mentioning the object name in the question, making it more demanding than typical VQA and visual grounding tasks. A comparative analysis is performed using the Toloka VQA challenge dataset, which has seen limited exploration in existing research. Our findings show that a combination of the DINO and T5 models achieved a high Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.67, demonstrating its effectiveness in this unique context. Similarly, the BERT combined with Swin Transformer model yielded a competitive IoU score of 0.60. In contrast, models like MobileNet-v2 and GPT with ResNet-50 + BERT struggled, displaying lower IoU values and highlighting the challenges posed by this dataset.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Analysis of Deep Learning Models on VQA(Toloka)Dataset
- Date Crossref
- 06/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Asian Academy of Business and Social Science Research
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.