Cuff Algometry Induces Large Yet Variable Conditioned Pain Modulation Effects

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigms provide a proxy measure of activity in the descending pain modulatory system. Cuff-pressure-algometry offers a standardised CPM assessment tool although comprehensive validation in large samples is lacking. To address this, we pooled cuff-algometry CPM data from 324 healthy participants across 8 studies. CPM magnitude was calculated as pain detection (PDT) and tolerance (PTT) threshold changes, assessed on the dominant leg in the presence and absence of a painful “conditioning” cuff stimulus on the contralateral leg. CPM-effects were robust for both changes in PDT and PTT (p<0.001). Using a classification approach where a ≥20% change in threshold designated a CPM responder, 69% of participants were CPM-responders for PDT and 59% for PTT. Test-retest reliability data were assessed in a subset of participants (n=72; interval 16.49±18.39days) using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Test-retest reliability was poor for CPM-effects (ICC=0.25-0.37) despite moderate-to-good reliability for PDT and PTT (ICC=0.69-0.87). Responder classification showed none -to- minimal agreement across sessions (Cohen’s κ=0.17-0.21), with 38% of participants switching classification for both PDT and PTT. Bootstrap analysis revealed that smaller samples provide highly variable ICC estimates, potentially explaining discrepancies with previous reliability reports. Despite producing large group-level CPM-effects, poor test-retest reliability of cuff algometry suggests it captures dynamic, state-dependent processes rather than a stable trait-like individual characteristic. This highlights the need to consider the temporal instability of CPM when interpreting data and considering its deployment within precision pain medicine.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.