Splicing Isoforms Associated with TGFβ-Induced Myofibroblast Activation
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Myofibroblast differentiation is a key process in developmental biology and involved in numerous physiopathology. The gene expression program orchestrating fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation, as well as its recapitulation by TGFβ stimulation in vitro , is relatively well characterized. Intriguingly, it is known that the splicing isoform EDA+FN1 is a marker and driver of myofibroblast differentiation, but the alternative splicing landscape of myofibroblast is unknown. Here, we performed a high-throughput transcriptomic approach by RNA-Seq in a primary skin fibroblast line and uncover more than 250 splicing isoforms associated with TGFβ-induced myofibroblasts using two different bioinformatic pipelines. This splicing profile highlights a distinct layer of regulation when compared to the global gene expression profile of myofibroblasts. A 5 alternative splicing event (ASE) signature [ ACTN1- 19A/19B; COL5A1 -64A/64B; COL6A3 exon 4; FLNA exon 30 and TPM1 -6a/6b] was further validated by ddPCR and AS-PCR and retrieved in publicly available RNA-Seq datasets describing other TGFβ-stimulated lung and skin fibroblasts. Surprisingly, TGFβ does not induce an EDA+FN1 splicing shift, although it stimulates global fibronectin expression. Thus, we conclude that the 5 ASEs signature may be used as putative universal myofibroblast markers and be of functional significance to myofibroblast formation and biology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Splicing Isoforms Associated with TGFβ-Induced Myofibroblast Activation
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.