Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugate combination therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are revolutionizing the treatment landscape of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Embase databases for published clinical trials evaluating ADC-combination regimens in aUC. We extracted safety and efficacy outcomes, including objective-response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and ≥ grade 3 AEs. We excluded narrative reviews, retrospective studies, and case reports. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance, followed by a full-text review for eligibility. A total of 645 patients from 5 trials investigating anti-nectin-4 (enfortumab vedotin, EV), anti-TROP2 (sacituzumab govitecan, SG), and anti-HER2 (disitamab vedotin, DV) ADCs were identified. We recorded a pooled ORR of 65%. We recorded a pooled risk rate for all-grade toxicity of 57%. The most prevalent any-grade AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy 52% (95% CI, 45%-59%), fatigue 45% (95% CI, 28%-64%), and diarrhea 42% (95% CI, 16%-74%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy, fatigue, and alopecia were more commonly observed in anti-nectin-4 regimens. Gastrointestinal (diarrhea and nausea) and hematologic (anemia and neutropenia) toxicities were more commonly observed in anti-TROP2 regimens. Hepatotoxicity was predominantly found in anti-HER2 regimens. While ADC-based combination regimens show promising responses, they also have high rates of AEs in patients with aUC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugate combination therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.