Endovascular treatment of a symptomatic giant partially thrombosed aneurysm with saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice (SEAL) XL: The world's largest novel intrasaccular device
Rattachement africain : us, gb, co. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Giant, partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms (GPTIAs) remain among the most technically challenging cerebrovascular lesions to treat, particularly in patients with associated cranial nerve or brainstem compression. Unlike microsurgical clipping with or without decompression, endovascular coiling, parent vessel flow diversion, or parent vessel occlusion, intrasaccular embolization presents a unique opportunity for immediate aneurysm occlusion and reduction of mass effect without requiring long-term antiplatelets or parent vessel compromise. However, to date, no prior intrasaccular devices were available to treat GPTIAs, including the Food and Drug Administration-approved Woven EndoBridge device which could only accommodate aneurysms up to ∼11 mm in width. Here, we present the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of minimally invasive endovascular intrasaccular aneurysm embolization for GPTIAs with the novel saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice (SEAL) XL device engineered with a dual-layer mesh design and an expanded size matrix aneurysms up to 20 mm in diameter. Further data from larger prospective case series are needed to validate these promising initial findings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endovascular treatment of a symptomatic giant partially thrombosed aneurysm with saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice (SEAL) XL: The world's largest novel intrasaccular device
- Date Crossref
- 06/10/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.