Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 preprint

Worst-case Error Bounds for Online Learning of Smooth Functions

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Online learning is a model of machine learning where the learner is trained on sequential feedback. We investigate worst-case error for the online learning of real functions that have certain smoothness constraints. Suppose that $\mathcal{F}_q$ is the class of all absolutely continuous functions $f: [0, 1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $\|f'\|_q \le 1$, and $\operatorname{opt}_p(\mathcal{F}_q)$ is the best possible upper bound on the sum of the $p^{\text{th}}$ powers of absolute prediction errors for any number of trials guaranteed by any learner. We show that for any $δ, ε\in (0, 1)$, $\operatorname{opt}_{1+δ} (\mathcal{F}_{1+ε}) = O(\min(δ, ε)^{-1})$. Combined with the previous results of Kimber and Long (1995) and Geneson and Zhou (2023), we achieve a complete characterization of the values of $p, q \ge 1$ that result in $\operatorname{opt}_p(\mathcal{F}_q)$ being finite, a problem open for nearly 30 years. We study the learning scenarios of smooth functions that also belong to certain special families of functions, such as polynomials. We prove a conjecture by Geneson and Zhou (2023) that it is not any easier to learn a polynomial in $\mathcal{F}_q$ than it is to learn any general function in $\mathcal{F}_q$. We also define a noisy model for the online learning of smooth functions, where the learner may receive incorrect feedback up to $η\ge 1$ times, denoting the worst-case error bound as $\operatorname{opt}^{\text{nf}}_{p, η} (\mathcal{F}_q)$. We prove that $\operatorname{opt}^{\text{nf}}_{p, η} (\mathcal{F}_q)$ is finite if and only if $\operatorname{opt}_p(\mathcal{F}_q)$ is. Moreover, we prove for all $p, q \ge 2$ and $η\ge 1$ that $\operatorname{opt}^{\text{nf}}_{p, η} (\mathcal{F}_q) = Θ(η)$.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les sujets associés

Machine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchMachine Learning and Data Classification

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.