Metabolic STAMP reveals GPCR signaling networks that program β-cell insulin secretion
Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
., GLP1-R) GPCRs coordinate GSIS remains unclear. In this study, we employed Metabolic-STAMP (Synchronized Temporal-Spatial Analysis via Microscopy and Phosphoproteomics) in both mouse β cells (MIN6) and primary human islets to map the dynamic signaling networks governing GSIS and to link transient phosphorylation events to their functional outcomes. We systematically interrogated GPCR-mediated phosphorylation events through selective pharmacological inhibitors, resolving signaling hierarchies and consensus patterns across multiple pathways. Our multi-modal approach uncovered key insulin-secretion-associated PTMs, linked phosphorylation targets with phenotypic organelle dynamics, and provided mechanistic insights into how GLP1-R versus FFAR4 modulates GSIS through shared and GPCR-specific phospho-signatures. We highlighted key examples of stimulus-specific regulation by high glucose alone versus GPCR stimulation, including context-specific activation of the classic ERK signaling pathway, compartmentalized PKA signaling, pathway specificity in organelle dynamics and inter-organellar contacts, and HDAC6/ATAT-mediated regulation of microtubule acetylation. Collectively, these findings provided a blueprint for deconvolving pathway specificity of β cell GPCR signaling, illuminated regulatory nodes that program insulin release, and offered new therapeutic targets to enhance β-cell function.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Metabolic STAMP reveals GPCR signaling networks that program β-cell insulin secretion
- Date Crossref
- 04/10/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.