Integrating transformers into physics-informed neural networks: An approach to lithium-ion battery state-of-health prognostics
Résumé fourni par la source
Accurate prediction of the State of Health for lithium-ion batteries is critical to ensure the operational safety and prolong the service life of energy storage systems. However, conventional purely data-driven models and physics-informed neural network often suffer from limited accuracy and poor generalization when dealing with battery samples exhibiting diverse electrochemical characteristics. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a Physics-Informed Neural Network integrated with Transformer for state of health prediction ( PI-TNet ). The framework introduces a Convolutional Data Processor to extract multi-dimensional features of electrochemical processes, while incorporating the Verhulst model as learnable parameters within a Vision Transformer architecture. This hybrid design enables simultaneous capture of long-term temporal dependencies in sequential cycling data and precise modeling of battery degradation mechanisms. Extensive cross-dataset validation using both NASA and CALCE battery datasets demonstrates that PI-TNet significantly outperforms existing methods in handling long-sequence prediction tasks while achieving better accuracy and generalization performance. • PI-TNet: A Transformer-integrated Physics-Informed Neural Network for SOH prediction. • The Verhulst model boosts interpretability with physical constraints. • PI-TNet outperforms models like MVIP-Trans and MyA+ by over 50% in key metrics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integrating transformers into physics-informed neural networks: An approach to lithium-ion battery state-of-health prognostics
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.