Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Australian health and social service providers’ perspectives on interpersonal and structural forms of reproductive coercion

2Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

This study explored how Australian health and social service providers describe both interpersonal and structural forms of reproductive coercion (RC), and how they perceive these forms to interact in practice from their experiences supporting RC victim-survivors. Guided by an adapted socio-ecological framework that helped distinguish interpersonal and structural RC, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 general practitioners, nurses, social workers, domestic violence workers, and obstetrician/gynaecologists. Reflexive thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) Conflict and control: being powered by fear , demonstrates how interpersonal coercion emerges when reproductive conflict is coupled with fear and power imbalances, prompting concealment or compliance; (2) The path of ‘shoulds’ , captures how explicit and implicit coercion arise from layered interpersonal and structural pressures, including cultural, societal and institutional norms that dictate who should or should not bear a child, with structural conditions often enabling interpersonal control; and (3) Unspoken, unenforced, yet deeply understood pressure , describes tacit coercion, internalised pressures often rooted in cultural and societal expectations that prompt individuals to self-regulate their reproductive choices or make protective decisions within constrained circumstances. Across the three themes, RC was understood as a relational and socially embedded phenomenon, where true freedom from coercion in reproductive decision-making depends not only on the absence of direct interference but also on having the space and supportive structures to make choices freely, safely, and in alignment with one’s own values. Future research must centre victim-survivor experiences to deepen this conceptualisation and explore how interpersonal and structural forms of RC intersect in lived realities. • This paper identifies explicit, implicit, and tacit forces shaping reproductive coercion (RC). • Explicit RC involves overt threats or violence impacting reproductive decisions. • Implicit RC manifests as subtle pressures like manipulation or emotional control. • Tacit RC stems from deeply internalised societal norms restricting reproductive autonomy. • We recommend provider education and training to recognise all forms of RC

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Australian health and social service providers’ perspectives on interpersonal and structural forms of reproductive coercion
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Homicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFamily Dynamics and Relationships

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.