A topological approach to the Cahn–Hilliard equation and hyperuniform fields
Rattachement africain : de, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Hyperuniform structures are disordered, correlated systems in which density fluctuations are suppressed at large scales. Such a property generalizes the concept of order in patterns and is relevant across diverse physical systems. We present a numerical characterization of hyperuniform scalar fields that leverages persistent homology. Topological features across different length scales are represented in persistence diagrams, while similarities or differences between patterns are quantified through Wasserstein distances between these diagrams. We apply this framework to numerical solutions of the Cahn–Hilliard equation, a canonical model for generating hyperuniform scalar fields. We validate the approach against known features of the Cahn–Hilliard equation, including its scaling properties, convergence to the sharp-interface limit, and the self-similarity of its solutions. We then generalize the approach by studying Gaussian random fields with different degrees and classes of hyperuniformity, demonstrating how it can be used to reconstruct large-scale properties from distributions of local topological information. Overall, we show how hyperuniform characteristics systematically correlate with distributions of topological features in disordered correlated fields. We expect this analysis to be applicable to a wide range of scalar fields, particularly those involving interfaces and free boundaries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A topological approach to the Cahn–Hilliard equation and hyperuniform fields
- Date Crossref
- 10/09/2026
- Éditeur
- European Mathematical Society - EMS - Publishing House GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.