In-vitro human myogenesis model reveals novel mRNA alternative splicing isoforms
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Myogenesis, the process of muscle formation and regeneration, involves substantial alterations in gene expression. While alternative splicing plays a crucial role in generating proteomic diversity during development and disease, its specific contributions to human muscle differentiation have not been systematically explored. Here, we examined altered mRNA splicing during myogenesis in two human myoblast cell lines using a hybrid transcriptomic approach that combines short-read (Illumina) and long-read (Nanopore) RNA-seq analyses. We identified 13,853 new significant splicing isoforms (60,582 total), with RNAs increasing and decreasing in abundance between days 0 and 3 (3,771 and 3,649, respectively), and between days 3 and 5 (1,302 and 1,109, respectively). We identified 1,937 significant differential transcript usage events (DTUs), implicating pathways relevant for muscle regulation. These findings were validated using RT-qPCR analysis and across mouse and human models, including clinical samples from peripheral artery disease patients. Artificial Intelligence algorithms predicted 595 myogenesis-associated, high-confidence, novel protein-coding splicing isoforms. This study uncovers splicing-regulated mechanisms in muscle development and pathologies, establishing an integrative framework for studying mRNA processing, essential for future muscle biology intervention studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- In-vitro human myogenesis model reveals novel mRNA alternative splicing isoforms
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.