Optimized Ion-Sensitive Hydrogels Based on Gellan Gum and Arabinogalactan for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition characterized by insufficient tear film stability and ocular discomfort. Conventional artificial tears offer limited efficacy due to short precorneal residence time. This study aimed to develop and optimize ion-sensitive in situ gelling formulations based on low-acyl gellan gum (GG) and arabinogalactan (AG) to enhance retention and therapeutic efficacy in DED. Various buffer systems were screened to identify optimal gelation conditions upon interaction with artificial tear fluid (ATF). Formulations were characterized by pH, osmolality, wettability, thermal behavior, viscosity, and viscoelastic properties. A Design of Experiments (DoE) approach was employed to understand the influence of GG and AG concentrations on rheological behavior. The selected formulation, GG(0.1%)/AG(0.2%), demonstrated a significant viscosity increase upon ATF dilution, suitable viscoelastic properties, enhanced mucoadhesion compared to hyaluronic acid, improved ferning patterns, no cytotoxic effects, and stability over time. In vivo studies in rabbits confirmed prolonged precorneal retention of the fluorescently labeled formulation. These results suggest that the GG/AG-based hydrogel is a promising strategy for improving the performance of artificial tears in DED treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Optimized Ion-Sensitive Hydrogels Based on Gellan Gum and Arabinogalactan for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.