Horner syndrome as a postoperative complication of thyroid surgery: a systematic review
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This systematic review aims to enhance surgeons' awareness of Horner Syndrome (HS) as a rare yet significant complication following thyroid surgery (TS). Data sources: Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Review methods: Based on the PRISMA framework, a comprehensive literature search was conducted covering the period from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2025. Results: Out of the 308 articles retrieved, 50 were included in this review, comprising 14 case series and 36 case reports. These studies documented a total of 40 cases of HS following TS. The overall incidence of HS was found to be 0.25%, with a higher incidence in open surgery (0.41%) compared to endoscopic surgery (0.15%). The incidence rate among children undergoing open surgery was 1.84%, which was higher than that among adults (0.22%). Malignant cases accounted for 67.5%, while benign cases represented the remaining 32.5%. HS symptoms typically manifested within 3 days post-surgery, with ptosis being the most common presentation. It rarely affects ocular function but may lead to decreased vision or heterochromia. Short-term steroid and neurotrophic therapy demonstrated some efficacy in alleviating symptoms, and complete recovery was more likely to occur within one year. Conclusion: HS represents a rare yet significant complication of TS, primarily attributed to surgical trauma to the cervical sympathetic chain (CSC). Clinicians must remain vigilant regarding this complication and employ meticulous surgical techniques to prevent CSC injury.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Horner syndrome as a postoperative complication of thyroid surgery: a systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.