Arterolane and piperaquine Vs. artemether and lumefantrine in uncomplicated malaria: A randomized study in Nigeria
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Arterolane maleate-Piperaquine phosphate (AMP) and Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in Nigerian patients with acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. METHODS: This phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled study included patients aged 12-65 years with acute symptomatic, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. A total of 350 patients were randomized (1:1) to Test group [AMP (150 mg+750 mg) once daily] or Comparator group [AL (80 mg+480 mg) twice daily] for 3 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) on Day 28. Secondary endpoints included PCR-corrected ACPR (Day 42), PCR-uncorrected ACPR (Days 28 and 42), fever clearance time (FCT), and parasite clearance time (PCT). RESULTS: PCR-corrected ACPR was 100% on Day 28 and sustained till Day 42 in both groups. PCR-uncorrected ACPR rates were comparable in both groups (AMP: 98.2%, AL: 99.4% on Day 28, P = 0.352; AMP: 98.2%, AL: 98.8% on Day 42, P = 0.674). No significant differences in FCT and PCT were observed between the groups. No drug-related adverse events (AEs) or severe AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Once-daily dosing of AMP demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to standard twice-daily dosing of AL in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. TRIAL ID: May 2023), URL: pactr.samrc.ac.za/Search.aspx.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Arterolane and piperaquine Vs. artemether and lumefantrine in uncomplicated malaria: A randomized study in Nigeria
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.