Recurrence rates with long-term follow-up after hallux valgus surgical treatment using proximal osteotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: To synthesize and critically appraise the literature on long-term outcomes of proximal osteotomies of the first metatarsal (M1) to treat HV without inflammatory disease or degenerative arthritis and to assess the long-term HV recurrence rates of studies with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Methods: This systematic review conforms to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted a search using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that report outcomes of proximal osteotomies of the M1 for non-inflammatory and non-degenerative HV at a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. We found four eligible studies comprising four datasets, and all assessed proximal osteotomies with a mean follow-up that ranged from 8 to 18 years. Results: The systematic search returned 7,918 records, of which 2,693 were duplicates, leaving 5,225 for screening. Of these, four studies were included, covering a total of 158 feet with a mean follow-up that ranged from 8 to 18 years. The pooled HVA following proximal osteotomies was 20.4° (CI: 11.3°-29.4°; I 2 = 95%), pooled IMA was 8.8° (CI: 3.3°-14.2°; I 2 = 98%), and pooled AOFAS was 82.1 (CI: 62.4-101.8; I 2 = 97%). Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of 8 years following proximal osteotomies of M1, the HVA was 20.4° and the IMA was 8.8°. Furthermore, the recurrence rates considering the various thresholds of HVA were 12% having >30°, 73% having >20°, and 13% if recurrence is a >10° increase in HVA. Level of evidence: Meta-analysis, level IV.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Recurrence rates with long-term follow-up after hallux valgus surgical treatment using proximal osteotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Bioscientifica
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.