Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Effect of repurposed simvastatin on disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-STAT2): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

13Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
50Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immune modulation in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis, disability progression is a major problem driven by multiple mechanisms. Comorbidities (eg, vascular risk) and ageing are thought to augment these neurodegenerative pathologies. In the phase 2b MS-STAT trial of simvastatin (80 mg) versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), the adjusted difference in brain atrophy rate between groups was -0·254% per year: a 43% reduction. In this phase 3 MS-STAT2 trial, we aimed to assess the efficacy of simvastatin versus placebo in slowing the progression of disability in SPMS. METHODS: This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at 31 neuroscience centres and district general hospitals in the UK. Participants aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of between 4·0 and 6·5 were eligible and randomly assigned (1:1) to oral simvastatin (80 mg) or matched placebo for up to 4·5 years, based on a minimisation algorithm within an independent and secure online randomisation service. All participants, site investigators, and the trial coordinating team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was time to 6-month EDSS confirmed disability progression (an increase of at least 1 point if EDSS score at baseline visit was less than 6·0 or an increase of 0·5 point if EDSS score at baseline visit was 6·0 or more) assessed in all randomly assigned participants (intention-to-treat analysis) without imputation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03387670) and is on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN82598726). The study is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 10, 2018, and July 26, 2024, 1079 patients were screened for eligibility and 964 participants were randomly assigned, with 482 (50%) in the placebo group and 482 (50%) in the simvastatin group. Of all 964 participants, 704 (73%) were female and 260 (27%) were male, with a mean age of 54 years (SD 7). 173 (36%) of 482 participants in the placebo group and 192 (40%) of 482 participants in the simvastatin group had 6-month confirmed disability progression (adjusted hazard ratio 1·13 [95% CI 0·91 to 1·39], p=0·26). Although no emergent safety issues were seen, there was one serious adverse reaction (rhabdomyolysis) in the simvastatin group. 12 (2%) of 482 participants in the placebo group and five (1%) of 482 participants in the simvastatin group had a cardiovascular serious adverse event. INTERPRETATION: The MS-STAT2 trial did not show a treatment effect of simvastatin in slowing disability progression in SPMS. Simvastatin use in multiple sclerosis should be confined to existing vascular indications. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK Multiple Sclerosis Society, and the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effect of repurposed simvastatin on disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-STAT2): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Date Crossref
01/10/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

National Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversity College LondonQueen Mary University of LondonNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCLNHS LothianUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustBelfast Health and Social Care TrustUniversity of UlsterBelfast City HospitalOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustPoole HospitalUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospital of WalesUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS TrustUniversity of CambridgeEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation TrustBarking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS TrustNIHR Exeter Clinical Research FacilityUniversity of LiverpoolWalton CentreNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of HullNorthern Health and Social Care TrustLewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeQueen Elizabeth University HospitalRoyal Victoria InfirmaryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation TrustImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustNorth Bristol NHS TrustUniversity of ExeterMultiple Sclerosis SocietySwansea Bay University Health BoardMorriston HospitalNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustQueen's Medical CentreSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of LeedsUK Dementia Research InstituteLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.