Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) remains a substantial global health burden, and its early detection and treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for early GC but is linked to an increased risk of complications, such as delayed hemorrhage, which underscore the need for a comprehensive investigation into the disease’s risk factors. AIM To perform a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature to identify and quantify risk factors associated with late-onset bleeding subsequent to ESD for early GC. METHODS Studies reporting risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library). The selection of studies, data retrieval, and quality evaluation were carried out separately by two reviewers. The combined odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random-effects approach. The meta-analysis has been registered on the International Registry of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202540116). RESULTS A total of 11 publications comprising 1945 patients were incorporated into the present analysis. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of delayed bleeding after ESD: Long operation time (OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 2.40–2.72, I ² = 11%, n = 5 studies), lesions detected in the upper part of the stomach (OR = 3.44, 95%CI: 3.19-3.70, I ² = 0%, n = 4 studies), advanced age (OR = 3.61, 95%CI: 3.47-3.76, I ² = 38%, n = 5 studies), history of taking antithrombotic drugs (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 2.48-2.68, I ² = 45%, n = 3 studies), resection size > 40 mm (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.78-3.26, I ² = 31%, n = 5 studies), hemodialysis (OR = 2.42, 95%CI: 2.33-2.51, I ² = 0%, n = 4 studies), presence of ulcers (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 2.33-2.77, I ² = 0%, n = 3 studies). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis identified several risk factors associated with an increased probability of delayed bleeding after ESD for early GC, including long operation time, lesions in the upper stomach, advanced age, antithrombotic drug use, large resection size, hemodialysis, and the presence of ulcers.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma
Date Crossref
27/09/2025
Éditeur
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Gastric Cancer Management and OutcomesEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.