One Step Closer to Conversational Medical Records: ChatGPT Parses Psoriasis Treatments from EMRs
Résumé fourni par la source
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are increasingly used in clinical settings, including documentation and decision support. However, their accuracy in extracting treatment data from unstructured dermatology records remains underexplored. We evaluated ChatGPT-4o’s ability to identify psoriasis treatments from free-text documentation, compared with expert annotations. Ninety-four electronic medical records (EMRs) of psoriasis patients were retrospectively analyzed. ChatGPT-4o extracted treatments from each note, and its output was compared to manually curated annotations by dermatologists. Eighty-three treatments, including topical agents, systemic medications, biologics, phototherapy, and procedures, were evaluated. Performance metrics included recall, precision, F1-score, specificity, accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa, and AUC. ChatGPT-4o demonstrated strong performance, with a recall of 0.91, a precision of 0.96, an F1-score of 0.94, a specificity of 0.99, and an accuracy of 0.99. Agreement with expert annotations was high (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.93; AUC = 0.98). Group-level analysis confirmed these results, with the highest performance in biologics and methotrexate (F1 = 1.00) and lower recall in categories with vague documentation, such as systemic steroids and antihistamines. Our study highlights the potential of LLMs to extract psoriasis treatment information from unstructured clinical documentation and structure it for research and decision support. The model performed best with well-defined, commonly used treatments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- One Step Closer to Conversational Medical Records: ChatGPT Parses Psoriasis Treatments from EMRs
- Date Crossref
- 29/09/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.