Automated detection of bottom‐of‐sulcus dysplasia on magnetic resonance imaging–positron emission tomography in patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: Bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia (BOSD) is a diagnostically challenging subtype of focal cortical dysplasia, 60% being missed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Automated MRI-based detection methods have been developed for focal cortical dysplasia, but not BOSD specifically, and few methods incorporate fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) alongside MRI features. We report the development and performance of an automated BOSD detector using combined MRI + PET. METHODS: . In the training set, 12 features from T1-MRI, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-MRI, and FDG-PET were evaluated to determine which features best distinguished dysplastic from normal-appearing cortex. Using the Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection group's machine-learning detection method with the addition of FDG-PET, neural network classifiers were then trained and tested on MRI + PET, MRI-only, and PET-only features. The proportion of patients whose BOSD was overlapped by the top output cluster, and the top five output clusters, were determined. RESULTS: Cortical and subcortical hypometabolism on FDG-PET was superior in discriminating dysplastic from normal-appearing cortex compared to MRI features. When the BOSD detector was trained on MRI + PET features, 87% BOSDs were overlapped by one of the top five clusters (69% top cluster) in the training set, 94% in the prospective test set (88% top cluster), and 75% in the published test set (58% top cluster). Cluster overlap was generally lower when the detector was trained and tested on PET-only or MRI-only features. SIGNIFICANCE: Detection of BOSD is possible using established MRI-based automated detection methods, supplemented with FDG-PET features and trained on a BOSD-specific cohort. In clinically appropriate patients with seemingly negative MRI, the detector could suggest MRI regions to scrutinize for possible BOSD.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.