Prostat kanserinde Lutetium-177-PSMA tedavisi: tek merkezli gerçek yaşam deneyimi
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aim: Lutetium-177–labeled PSMA radioligand therapy has emerged as a promising option in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), yet real-world data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features, treatment patterns, and predictors of response in patients treated with Lutetium-177-PSMA therapy at a single academic center. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with mCRPC who received Lutetium-177-PSMA between January 2020 and January 2025. Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% decline in PSA (PSA50). Associations between baseline variables and PSA50 were examined using Mann–Whitney U tests, and predictive biomarkers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The PSA50 response rate was 41.7%. Lower baseline PSA (p = 0.023), ALP (p = 0.037), and LDH (p = 0.004) levels, and higher hemoglobin (p = 0.024), were significantly associated with response. Hemoglobin demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.692), while PSA, ALP, and LDH showed significant but limited predictive value. Treatment was well tolerated, with only one case of grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: Lutetium-177-PSMA therapy provides clinical benefit in real-world mCRPC patients. Lower tumor burden and preserved hematologic status may predict better biochemical response, with hemoglobin serving as a moderately accurate biomarker. Prospective validation is warranted.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prostat kanserinde Lutetium-177-PSMA tedavisi: tek merkezli gerçek yaşam deneyimi
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.