Navigating the Future of Learning: A Review of Teacher Professional Development and Implementation Challenges in K-12 STEAM Education (2015-2025)
Résumé fourni par la source
This systematic synthesis integrates recent literature from 2015 to 2025 to explore K-12 teachers' professional development and the common challenges they encounter in instructing STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) learning. STEAM, as a combined K-12 learning approach, is conceptualized to prepare students for 21st-century workforce demands with essential learning skills; notwithstanding, successful implementation is usually hindered by systemic and pedagogical barriers. Our synthesis reveals prominent barriers, such as rigid curricula, resource constraints, insufficient preparation for interdisciplinary and intrapersonal competencies, and inconsistent administrative support. Successful methodologies, by contrast, value the potential of experiential, interdisciplinary and intrapersonal and iterative professional learning to broaden the self-efficacy of teachers, construct interdisciplinary and intrapersonal knowledge bases, and integrate technology. authentic classroom practice is invariably characterized by culturally responsive, inquiry-based, and student-centered learning environments. The synthesis provides practical recommendations for teachers, policymakers, and professional learning leaders to incorporate tailored support and adaptive structures to allow teachers to facilitate meaningful STEAM learning experiences.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Navigating the Future of Learning: A Review of Teacher Professional Development and Implementation Challenges in K-12 STEAM Education (2015-2025)
- Date Crossref
- 20/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Wisdom Education & Research Hub
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.